In case you missed it, Flextight scanners have vanished from the Hasselblad website around May 2019 and macOS Catalina doesn’t run FlexColor anymore. No software updates are planned, plus I’ve run into problems dealing with fff files in Photoshop 2020. Heavens!
Flextight scanners
MacOS 11 Big Sur is listed as a “Recommended” system for Photoshop 2021 (version 22), but not for Photoshop 2020 or earlier. However, there are several known issues, listed in the Adobe document Photoshop and Big Sur. Photoshop system requirements as of November 12, 2020. Apple officially released macOS Catalina yesterday, and neither Adobe Lightroom Classic nor Adobe Photoshop CC were fully prepared to handle the new operating system as of this writing. Adobe Photoshop Lightroom – There is a specific version of Adobe Photoshop Lightroom intended for Macs. And it’s more interesting to use compared to other Adobe Photoshop versions. Lyn – This app is the perfect companion for Mac users who are also fond of taking photos. It is a must-have for those who have galleries filled with photos. More Catalina issues? Apple Support is the best resource for any additional problems you may experience while using Catalina. Apple offers phone, chat, or in-person help at their retail locations.
Flextight X1 and X5, the flagship (and only left) models in Hasselblad’s lineup have been discontinued: EOL, kaputt. No official announcement has been published, but a number of users around the world have had the news confirmed either from dealers or servicing shops.
It’s pointless to ask the reason why, scanners have always been a low priority asset to Hasselblad. Flextight know-how and hardware were acquired in 2014 when the company merged with Imacon: reliable sources told me that the engineering team has always been quite small. My best bet is that the 2017 acquisition of Hasselblad by DJI, a Chinese drone-making company, gave scanners the coup de grace.
The good news is that servicing will be available for the foreseeable future, as customer service wrote me:
The Flextight scanners are full service supported in our factory service in Gothenburg, Sweden and a selected number of regional scanner partners are able to perform local service and preventive maintenance. We will continue to perform service for these scanners as long as we will have spare parts, therefore it is difficult to appreciate for how long.
In fact, this is what you can read when logging in the private area of the Hasselblad website.
FlexColor software
Unclear information has been given to users in the past, when many of us pinged Hasselblad about the pressing issue of macOS 10.15 Catalina blocking 32bit applications. Any hope to see a 64bit FlexColor rewrite has been definitely flushed away when customer support eventually started to reply that:
[…] we currently have no plans to release an updated version of Flexcolor.
Skylanders spyro adventure pc iso torrent. As expected, the software has been EOLed very much like the hardware. Not that it has ever received much care: the last available versions are 4.8.13 (2011, for Mac) and 4.8.9 (2012, for Windows).
To the best of my knowledge, the Windows version still runs on whatever version is Windows at now, but with macOS you’re capped to 10.14 Mojave.
Neither FlexColor nor the scanners do require a high-performance computer, they’re probably going to work fine with old dedicated hardware for years to come. I think it’s possible to run Catalina and virtualize (with Parallels or VMWare) Mojave so that you can still run 32bit apps. Let’s hope that by the time the whole process becomes impractical or the spare parts are out of stock, the film we want to scan has been eroded away by chemical remains and fungi – checkmate, problem solved1.
Finally, due to legal reasons (very likely the use of some internal libraries that prevent it) FlexColor can’t be open-sourced. There are rumors about VueScan willing (or having been asked) to implement a module that would drive the Flextight hardware, but I couldn’t been able to find any official statement.
So this is the state of affairs for the hardware, what about existing archives?
3F files
Here things are getting slightly more complex, please bear with me.
As we all know, FlexColor is used by archivists and photoshoppers alike to browse through, and extract .tif files from, huge collections of .fff (aka 3F) files. You may or may not know that the 3F format is nothing but a .tif file with some proprietary tags: to prove it, try renaming a .fff to .tif and open it in Photoshop. The extra stuff is:
- the compressed/low-res bitmap preview that FlexColor uses to temporarily display the 3F while waiting to read the actual data from the file (only if the 3F isn’t too large, in which case you’re always only shown the preview)
- metadata related to the scan acquisition and FlexColor settings (e.g. curves, FlexTouch, saturation, snapshots, etc.)
I have grown accustomed to skip FlexColor altogether for anything but driving the scanner (acquiring the 3F), and browsing (i.e. visualizing the files). That is to say: I do not use FlexColor anymore for any 3F processing nor .tif extraction. I’ve never liked FlexColor rudimental, limited features – they were sort-of OK in the mid-2000s, or for large files batches quick post-processing. My client’s work today is more focused on a smaller selection of scans, to be post-produced very accurately, so I only use Photoshop.
To briefly sum up the way I use to work (which I can expand in a separate blogpost – leave a comment below in case it is of any interest):
- I open the 3F in Photoshop (thanks to the
Imacon3F.pluginor its.8bfWindows version), which in my case is going to appear as a color negative. - I apply an Invert adjustment layer and a couple of Curves adjustment layers to make it look more or less correct to my eyes – no need to be precise here.
- I duplicate the background layer and perform all sorts of retouching voodoo (against dust, scratches, chemicals stains, fingerprints, semen, etc.), saving this intermediate layered file as a separate, temporary
.psb. - When I’m happy, I flatten all the bitmap layers and discard all the adjustment layers, so that I’m back with a one-layer, color negative file again.
- I re-open the original
.ffffile, drag and drop the retouched layer from the.psb, flatten, and save as.CLEAN.fff– this because one never knows what the future brings… I then trash the intermediate.psb. - I keep the
.CLEAN.fffopen: assign the FlexColor Input ICC, convert to Adobe RGB, Invert, and save my working file as a.psb. This is my starting point, to which I apply the usual Curves, and whatever it takes to make the image work.
Enter another stray bullet in the Hasselblad game: Adobe. It turns out that Photoshop 2020 doesn’t want to open 3Fs anymore, popping up this new errors:
In recent versions, you already had to set the Open dialog’s settings to Enable: All Documents (and of course the Format: Imacon 3f) otherwise Adobe Camera Raw kicked in trying to open the file, mistaking it as coming from a digital back.
The last working version (at least on a Mac) is Photoshop CC 2019 – which is a big concern. Why? You may or may not have heard that in the last months Adobe has aggressively restricted the licensed versions range for Photoshop – e.g. you cannot, theoretically, install or run, say, Photoshop CC 2015 anymore. Without entering into yet another rabbit hole, it all boils down to royalties with third-parties, very likely Dolby2.
In the end, Adobe’s versions policy is (and it is fair to expect that it will be their default from now on) to license N-1 versions – in other words: you’ll be allowed to download and install the latest Photoshop, plus the version before it, period. At the time I’m writing this, it is PS 2020 + PS CC 2019. In one year, CC 2019 will be dropped, and it’ll be PS 2021 + PS 2020.
Which means: one year from now, the officially available Photoshop versions won’t open 3F files anymore, and working versions’ installers won’t be available for download either. LMAO.
There is also the tangentially related problem of macOS notarization/digital signature, from macOS Catalina onwards: .plugin files are requested to be at least3 signed by the developer, otherwise macOS GateKeeper will prevent to run them. This is not too much of a big deal, I have an active Apple Developer membership and I can sign the file myself if needed.
TL;DR
- Hasselblad Flextight X1 and X5 scanners (previously known as Imacon) are discontinued. Scanner servicing will be provided as usual as long as spare parts will be available.
- FlexColor is abandonware: it doesn’t run on any macOS > 10.14.
- 3F files don’t open anymore in Photoshop 2020; very likely the CC 2019 installer is not going to be available one year from now, and even if you have one, it’s definitely possible that macOS Catalina will prevent
Imacon3F.pluginfrom working because it’s not signed/notarized.
Workarounds (if any)
The following is partly subjective.
- Acquiring new scans, for the time being, requires FlexColor; so either you keep dedicated hardware running macOS Mojave, or you switch to Windows.
- Browsing 3F collections is, and will keep being, a pain in the butt: FlexColor is the lesser evil, Adobe Bridge seems unable to load just the low-res preview that is embedded in
.ffffiles and it takes forever to read the file content to create a thumbnail. The same holds true with Finder. I’m not aware of any other viable options for the Mac. - Extracting
.tiffiles for 3F post-processing is not a problem, as long as the Photoshop plugin keeps working 🤞🏻.
Feel free to comment below if you have updated news, workflow suggestions, or you just want to share your point of view as a Hasselblad user. Thanks!
Catalina Photoshop Crack
Please bear with me but I’m right in the middle of the postproduction of a batch of large format, color negative scans from the early 1980, and it’s a mess. Are you nostalgic of the old days of analogic photography? Bloody hell, no. ↩
Read here for more info about the Adobe-Dolby lawsuit. ↩
It is unclear to me, at the moment, whether a digital signature is enough or I would be required to notarize the
.pluginas well – not a big deal either, but not running Catalina myself I cannot test it. ↩
Mac Catalina Photoshop
If you’ve continued to use iPhoto after Apple discontinued it in 2015, you had to know its days were numbered. Many people preferred iPhoto’s controls and the new Photos app was initially missing features and buggy, crashy, and slow at times. Photos has improved substantially, though it’s still not everyone’s cup of tea.
Now, iPhoto’s number is finally truly up. The outdated software won’t launch in macOS Catalina, because its core functions rely on a software framework Apple has also sent riding into the sunset.
If you upgraded to Catalina without first launching Photos or finding another solution, what options do you have? Plenty.
Launch Photos in Catalina. Photos can still read and upgrade an iPhoto library, as it doesn’t require launching iPhoto. Photos doesn’t copy the iPhoto images, but it uses a special kind of link that lets the same file exist in two places, avoiding increasing your storage requirements.
Switch to Google Photos. Google offers desktop and mobile apps for importing images and syncs via its cloud service. You can have the desktop software read an iPhoto library to upload your images.
Switch to Adobe Lightroom for photo library managing and maybe for cloud-based sync. Adobe offers two different versions: one is oriented towards images stored on a computer (Lightroom Classic), while the other leans heavily on cloud-based sharing and access for mobile, desktop, and Web (the weirdly named Adobe Photoshop Lightroom). The cloud-oriented version is just $10 a month, which includes 1TB of storage and the use of all the apps across your devices.
Install a virtual machine to keep macOS Mojave or an earlier macOS running for iPhoto and other apps. While it’s not a solution forever, you can use Parallels or VMWare Fusion within Catalina. You can postpone making a change for a little or long while. (You could also revert to Mojave, but that’s a time-limited choice, too, and Mac models released after this point won’t run macOS before Catalina.)
Mac Os Catalina Photoshop
With Google Photos and either Lightroom choice, you won’t be able to preserve metadata added in iPhoto, however. And you might not be able to import modified versions of photos you edited within iPhoto—only the originals. Upgrading to Photos or using a virtual machine preserves both.
This Mac 911 article is in response to a question submitted by Macworld reader Ken.
Ask Mac 911
Catalina Photoshop Cc 2017
We’ve compiled a list of the questions we get asked most frequently along with answers and links to columns: read our super FAQ to see if your question is covered. If not, we’re always looking for new problems to solve! Email yours to mac911@macworld.com including screen captures as appropriate, and whether you want your full name used. Not every question will be answered, we don’t reply to email, and we cannot provide direct troubleshooting advice.